Punchit Labs is a security-first development studio for teams building protocols, tokenized products, and production dApps. We combine rigorous architecture, practical delivery, and operator-level accountability from discovery to launch.
We cover protocol logic, application layers, launch mechanics, and quality systems so your team can make decisions with confidence.
Production-ready contracts for tokens, incentives, treasury operations, and protocol modules with test coverage and upgrade controls.
Mechanism design for AMMs, staking, lending, emissions, or custom primitives where economics and implementation stay aligned.
Wallet-native experiences connected to robust data pipelines, backend services, and operational observability.
Bridge external systems with on-chain logic: payment rails, analytics, custodial services, and automation networks.
Audit readiness with threat modeling, test evidence, formal handoff packages, and issue triage support.
Token launch, migration, and release operations that balance speed with safety and transparent communication.
We focus on products that need strong reliability under real user load, not just experimental proofs-of-concept.
AMMs, vaults, lending pools, and market-making primitives with parameter safety rails and transparent governance controls.
Asset-backed token workflows for issuance, compliance constraints, redemption logic, and investor reporting.
Transaction-safe wallet UX with signing clarity, account abstraction patterns, and backend safeguards.
Keeper-driven workflows for treasury policies, rewards, and rebalancing jobs with fallback procedures.
Data layers for protocol dashboards, monitoring, and financial reporting across contracts and backend systems.
B2B blockchain rollouts that tie into existing identity, accounting, and approval workflows.
Our process is designed to reduce ambiguity, surface risk early, and keep delivery predictable for both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
We align on product goals, user flows, constraints, and attack surfaces. Output: delivery scope, architecture options, and risk register.
We design data models, contract boundaries, role permissions, and integration points with explicit tradeoff documentation.
Senior engineers ship in tracked sprints with clean commits, reproducible scripts, and weekly demos tied to measurable progress.
Unit, fuzz, invariant, and integration tests validate business rules and edge behavior before production candidate sign-off.
Controlled rollout with verification steps, deployment records, and rollback plans. Critical paths get staged activation.
Post-launch monitoring, issue triage, optimization backlog, and upgrade planning keep momentum without sacrificing safety.
We measure delivery by reliability, efficiency, and operator confidence, not vanity launch metrics.
Threat model on day one, privileged action matrix, and staged activation controls before every production release.
Automated gas snapshots in CI and targeted optimization for user-heavy paths like claims, swaps, and staking actions.
Milestone-based sprint planning with weekly executive summaries covering completed scope, risks, and next steps.
Automated linting, static checks, and test pipelines with issue templates and reproducible deployment scripts.
Representative engagements that show how we combine protocol logic, product delivery, and operational readiness.
Redesigned reward accounting and keeper cadence for a live AMM network, reducing failed reward transactions by 78% while improving gas efficiency.
Read case studyBuilt role-aware issuance flows with compliance constraints and audit-ready reporting for regulated investor operations.
Read case studyIntroduced policy-based rebalancing and threshold alerts with fail-safe controls, reducing manual treasury operations from daily to weekly.
Read case studyImplemented indexed event pipelines and aggregate APIs that cut dashboard lag from minutes to seconds across two chains.
Read case studyThe best time is before architecture is frozen. Early engagement lets us prevent expensive rewrites in permissions, accounting, and upgrade paths.
No. We support EVM as primary, and can design or integrate with Solana-style program flows when the product requires it.
Yes. Many engagements are co-delivery models where we own core protocol modules while internal teams handle product layers.
We provide a complete handoff package: threat model, test evidence, architecture notes, known limitations, and issue triage priorities.
Weekly sprint cycles with milestone checkpoints, stakeholder demos, and risk reviews. Critical releases include additional hardening windows.
Yes. We focus on implementable tokenomics: vesting mechanics, emissions controls, and governance flows that engineering can enforce on-chain.
Every week includes completed scope, pending risks, decisions required, and next milestone confidence, with direct links to repo artifacts.
Yes. We run targeted optimization tracks for gas, incident response readiness, monitoring quality, and governance process hardening.
We use scoped discovery packages, milestone-based build sprints, and optional retainers for sustained protocol and product support.
We handle changes through explicit scope tradeoffs, impact estimates, and milestone re-baselining so timelines stay realistic and controlled.
Tell us what you are shipping, where you are blocked, and what timeline you are targeting. We will respond with a practical next-step plan and estimated engagement shape.
